Showing posts with label Courageous Conversations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Courageous Conversations. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

After Lament ... On the Road to Emmaus

It is through the process of Lament that we come to the realization that all of our hopes have been stripped away and what remains is Jesus on the road to Emmaus. 

In lament, we cry out to G-d to be the redeemer of our current crisis. Through the process of lamenting, we eventually learn to relinquish our notions of being in control. After lament, all we have left is agency in how we respond to G-d and to the dis-ease of our current situation. 


And now, finally, after lamenting, we understand just how pathetic all this really is. Pathetic, as from the Greek pathos, meaning experience or condition or emotion of suffering. Pathos is the road to Emmaus. It is a situation that can not be avoided or circumnavigated, only endured as we go through it. It is walking that road with our shattered hopes until, step by step, we come to accept that this is indeed the way things are now.



“Pathos Entered English in the 1500s. The Greek word páthos means "experience, misfortune, emotion, condition,” and comes from Greek path-, meaning “experience, undergo, suffer.” In English, pathos usually refers to the element in an experience or in an artistic work that makes us feel compassion, pity, or sympathy. The word is a member of a big family: empathy is the ability to share someone else’s feelings. Pathetic (in its gentlest uses) describes things that move us to pity. Though pathology is not literally "the study of suffering," it is "the study of diseases." Other relatives of pathos include sympathy, apathy, and antipathy.”  

(Pathos Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster from Merriam-Webster online dictionary.  https://www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › pathos. Accessed Aug. 24, 2023.)


Pathos can also be understood as that quality of our experience that appeals to our emotions, evoking our internal response to suffering. It is the impetus to compassion and the beginning of empathy. In the pathetic, where we must accept our crisis for what it is, we are invited to change our perspective and relationship with suffering. It is our suffering that prevents us from recognizing Jesus on the road with us, even as the Christ listens intently to all that we had hoped for that is not, and will not, come to fruition. On our pathetic journey, we are wrestling with accepting what we thought was unacceptable. We struggle to understand how we are to respond. Do we stay and do nothing? Do you stay and fight to the point of exhausting everything, or do we shake the dust off of our feet and leave? 



On that difficult walk to Emmaus, we are encouraged by Christ to name all that is lost, to open our eyes to what is happening, and to release our expectations of how we want things to be. Don’t we perpetuate our own suffering by refusing to accept that things are not how we want them to be? Isn’t our own suffering a denial of self-acceptance? When we are in crisis and have lamented all that is not right, begging G-d to come to the rescue, what is left for us to do while we wait for G-d to respond? At the end of our lamenting, when we are depleted and exhausted with nothing left to say, what would the Holy One have us do?


We are not G-d. We are not in control. All we really have now is just agency in how we respond to the pathetic situation we find ourselves in. Now we begin to comprehend that we do have agency in responding to that which feels so out of control. In our embodied movement with the Divine on the road to Emmaus, we have the opportunity to participate in relieving some of our own suffering by accepting what is, in fact, a pathetic condition. 




Even though this is not what we had hoped for and this is not what we want, movement is change. Change is almost always stress-filled. It is uncomfortable, but it is a development in our situation. To ease our own suffering, we must accept that things are not in reality playing out as we had hoped or how we want it to be. We just have to keep moving through it. It sounds so simple, and yet is so hard to do.


This acceptance can’t come without empathy. The Risen Christ joins us on the road to Emmaus, present with us in the pathetic journey to acceptance. Empathy, again coming from the Greek, means to be in the pathetic. Christ is with us in the pathetic, in the suffering. Emmanuel; G-d with us. We are not alone in our suffering. G-d is with us, even if we are blinded to the Divine’s presence. 



Perhaps, like other disciples before us, it is only after the fact that we can acknowledge that our hearts were burning as the Christ spoke to us on the journey. Didn’t it all become clear as we moved along the road together, while the Holy opened up the story of this suffering, and the significance of our pathetic part, in the ancient story of our faith? When we can finally acknowledge that we are indeed suffering, and a source of our suffering is our own repudiation of what is, that’s when compassion comes flooding in.


Compassion - with suffering. Compassion is a gift from Christ on the road to Emmaus. It is finally the Divine’s response to our laments. It is the Divine’s communication that we are not left alone to carry the burden of our pathetic situation, but, indeed, G-d is with us in our suffering. Once we can accept that, really accept it without any doubt, accept that G-d is with us, does not abandon us, and continues to love us just as we are in the pathetic place that we are ... well, that acceptance just might be the hinge of our critical circumstances. When our eyes are finally opened and we recognize who Christ is, recognize who we are in relationship with G-d, and recognize who G-d has created us to be in this pathetic world, we can finally, truly accept that we are loved, lovable, and capable of so much loving - even of ourselves in this pathetic experience.




If we believe that we are made in the image of G-d, the Trinitarian Divine, the Holy Loving Community, then we believe that, like G-d in Community, we are loved; we are lovable; we are loving. When we accept that G-d is loved, lovable, and loving and that our identity is loved, lovable, and loving, we may finally accept that we are worthy of compassion - and not just from G-d, but from ourselves. 


Our acceptance of what is and release of what we wanted, is an invitation to tap into the aquifer of living water that never ceases. This source of living water, which is constantly refreshing and renewing our own self-compassion, is founded in Christ’s compassion for the us and the world.




Friday, August 18, 2023

RISK

    We are ambivalent about risk, aren’t we. It threatens danger and unwelcome loss while tempting us with the possibility of reward. It entails exposure to concealed consequences and requires faith that future conclusions, in the words of Julian of Norwich, will be well and that all manner of thing will work out well. Risk makes us vulnerable to the unknown while demanding our agency to respond to that which is unknown. Risk is also the spiritual disciple of taking the next right step without the assurance of favorable outcomes, but the belief that it will lead to the next right step after that. Risk is a necessary part of becoming fully human, chancing the integration of our whole body, mind, and soul in order to flourish in our own messy lives.
    The incarnation is G-d’s embodied self-revelation to us through the local vernacular that we can comprehend - flesh. Quite risqué, it is G-d with skin-on. Relationally, the incarnation is G-d putting some skin in our unpredictable game of life, making an investment in us that is worth the inherent gamble. “The word did not just become flesh and dwell among us,” Ronald Rolheiser explains, “it became flesh and continues to dwell among us. In the body of believers and in the Eucharist, God still has physical skin and can still be physically present seen, touched, smelled, heard, and tasted.”(1)
    The mystery of the incarnation then, and the embodiment of Christ through believers now, serves as G-d’s ultimate conveyance and connection in action. It is G-d’s loving desire to be in intimate, authentic relationships with us regardless of the risk. Through a neo-orthodox theological lens (2), this is the greatest act of love. “[T]he very humanity of God is seen through the outpouring of God’s love, which,” Kelly Brown Douglas points out, “is God’s reaching out to be in particular relationship with humanity.”(3) This act of loving presence on the part of G-d is a natural overflowing of G-d’s love for G-dself in community.(4) Taking on the flesh of humanity, enrobing himself in our corporal nature, Jesus the Christ exhibited for us the paramount paradigm of humanity, integrating flesh and spirit as a model for our existence. The incarnate Christ demonstrates the perfected process of becoming fully human as the embodiment of exemplary right relationship with the Divine and the goodness of creation.  Therefore, as imitators of Christ, our becoming fully human compels us to emulate G-d’s embodied, loving presence in relationship with the created order. Like Christ, to be in loving relationship with the Holy One is to also be in loving relationship with others, just as we are in our enfleshed humanity. Also like Christ, this is the greatest manifestation of love made real, but it is also our greatest manifestation of real risk. 
G-d in Community is more than sufficient for G-dself, whole and complete - by definition, perfect -lacking nothing in perfect union. Creation is a cosmic consequence of Divine love overflowing and breaching the banks of the boundless borders of G-dself. There is no inherent risk in G-d’s divine loving of G-d’s-self, only absolute authenticity and mutuality in intimate appreciation and desire. Creation, as a blessed byproduct of such sacred erotic adoration, is not inherently risk-filled either. Contrary to Elizabeth M. Edman’s argument, in order to create us, G-d did not take a risk.(5) The risk came in choosing to love G-d’s creation. The incarnation of the Word, Christ enfleshed dwelling with us, is love embodied and risk revealed. Edman’s words, though, cannot be more true, “God put God’s heart on the line for us.”(6)
    Kelly Brown Douglas responds that although the incarnation is evidence that “women and men are loved by God, it is not inevitable that they will share in the love…To do so requires that individuals freely choose to share the love of God as God freely chose to love them.”(7) Therein lies the risk. It is risky to authentically love the other who is gifted with the freewill of choosing whether to accept or deny that saving love.(8) Freewill is gifted to all humankind, even Jesus of Nazareth. By taking on our humanity and perfectly embodying the integration of the Divine and the flesh, Jesus the Christ, the Word of the Triune G-d, takes on all the complexities of humankind, both risk and reward. 
G-d’s love is more than enough to take on the risk of loving us in our embodied humanity, with no guarantee that we will chose to love G-d in return. Revealing G-dself through the incarnation enfleshes G-d’s love for us, but “revealing oneself authentically carries potential risk.”(9) The risk of authenticity is necessary if the incarnate Christ is to model for us embodied human flourishing. “In order to find a deep, intimate connection,” as Edman says, “[to] love and be loved deeply, intimately - we have to reveal ourselves.”(10)

In the incarnation, G-d demonstrates that love is worth the risk of revealing ourselves authentically for intimate “communication and communion.”(11) G-d embodied this risk through the incarnation, taking on our human form - even in the precarious weakness of a migrant, houseless infant; even in the precarious weakness of an oppressed minority; even in the precarious weakness of a body battered and sacrifice for the other - all to love us enough to risk connecting with us. G-d risks loving us because G-d has faith in us - that we are worthy of G-d’s love. Isn’t that the miracle of the incarnation? That G-d is willing to Relinquish Indelible Sacred Knowledge (RISK) that creation will choose to love G-d in return requires G-d to give humanity agency in how we respond to G-d’s love. We know love, because G-d loves us first. We risk love because G-d risks love first. For us, that means we must Realize our Incomplete Sapience of Kenosis (RISK) and have faith in G-d. Ultimately, the Reward for our Inability to Substantiate Karmic-consequences (RISK) is to believe not only that G-d has faith in us, but that G-d has faith in G-dself - that G-d is worthy of our risky love, too. 



1.Ronald Rolheiser, Holy Longing: The Search for Christian Spirituality (New York:Image, 2014), 80.

2.Carrie Allport, “A Spirituality of Crisis” (GTS AT 399: Independent Study: Crisis & Kairos, 2021), 2.

3.Kelly Brown Douglas, Sexuality and the Black Church: A Womanist Perspective (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1999), 113.

4.Belden C. Lane, “Christ’s Descent into Hell, Hadewijch, and the Fierceness of Love: A Spirituality of Holy Saturday,” in Spiritus 23, no.1 (Spring 2023), 146-154.

5. Elizabeth M. Edman, “Risk,” in Queer Virtue: What LGBTQ People Know About Life and Love and How It Can Revitalize Christianity (Boston: Beacon Press, 2016), 43-64.

6. Edman, Queer Virtue, 44.

7. Brown Douglas, Sexuality and the Black Church, 114.

8. Frederick Buechner, “The Road to Emmaus,” in The Magnificent Defeat, (HarperSan Francisco: Harper Collins Publishers, 1966),  82-89.

9. Edman, Queer Virtue, 45.

10. Edman, Queer Virtue, 46.

11. James B. Nelson, Embodiment: An Approach to Sexuality and Christian Theology (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg, 1978), 18.


Wintering Prayer

I’m thresholding, G-d, in another season of Winter in my midlife.   The solstice has passed and a chill has settled into my bones and the st...